I watched Amelie for the first time this weekend. I missed it when it on general release and finally bought it as a cheap DVD. It is worth every penny and more. It is one of the most visually arresting films I've ever seen, and I actually found it really difficult to knit while watching, as every scene demands total visual concentration. The colours are almost cartoonish and hyper-real, and the sets are unbelievably detailed and fabulous. The director makes a fruit & veg stall a work of art and the railways stations of Paris never looked so lovely.
It's also very funny, and the strange characters are endearing rather than disturbing. Everyone has manic or obsessive tendencies and many are collectors. Of proverbs, discarded photos, endives, copies of a Renoir painting. These quirky details accumulate and build up to make quite beautiful, if apparently meaningless, collections.
It made me think about my own collecting tendencies, especially as I'd just read Alicia's delightful post of March 15 about a group of button collectors. I always wanted to be a great amasser of objects, and as a child I had trolls and a few books but not a great deal more. In fact, I've never fulfilled my collecting ambitions, mainly because I am terrified of feeling compelled to spend any spare cash on growing a collection purely for the sake of owning objects, and partly because I run out of steam quite quickly and my magpie instincts are distracted by some new whim. Also, I am loath to keep special things locked away, and much prefer to be able to use any small collections I do have.
Last year I bought a number of tablecloths featuring crinoline ladies. Completely unfashionable and yet totally seductive. I scoured market town flea-markets when on holiday, friends found others, and the rest I bought on eBay. I had a strict budget and I only wanted hand-embroidered, natural fabrics. Before long, I had a great little collection of beautifully embroidered items which didn't cost a fortune.
The crinoline lady is a 1930s icon. She was everywhere; on textiles, tea-pots and tea-cosies, book & magazine covers. I know it's all highly stylised and ridiculously escapist, but I am fascinated by the fact that so many women bought transfers of this design and sat and embroidered a lady who is really only good for picking flowers and looking pretty during their breaks from the mangle and cleaning the lino kitchen floor.
Transfers also came free with women's magazines, and once I'd started looking, I found several pieces with the same design (one or two designs seem to have been incredibly popular). The ones in the photos are all the same, basic outline (my favourite design), but done by different embroiderers. They are all expertly sewn, but each maker has interpreted the lines, stitches and colours quite differently.
The top two are from the same cloth. They are done by someone who clearly wasn't afraid of bold colour combinations and setting thickly embroidered sections next to simple lines. You can just see in the second photo that the lady is unfinished. I bought the cloth knowing it was not completed, because I had never seen anything as unusual and modern as this.
This lady is on a textured cotton background and in a very different, restricted palette. All four ladies in the corners are the same. The cloth is much smaller than the others, so the embroiderer chose wisely when leaving much of the design open.
The one below has very different stitching (look at the hollyhocks), and I love the sash on her dress.
And, finally, this cloth is much more traditional in the choice of colours. This lady is far more shy & retiring and the lines are less flowing and elegant; I like to think the bolder crinoline ladies above somehow reflect their makers who appear to have been more Scarlett O'Hara than Melanie Hamilton.
Crinoline lady embroidery was despised by 'art' embroiderers as dull and lifeless and a waste of good skills. But these dainty designs remind you just how few people can embroider beautifully these days. Like all frivolous collections, they really are worth preserving.